| Line 257: |
Line 257: |
| | ::::* In this context the Dawidowicz was inappropiate. And if you are looking for some arguments against the dawidowicz quote, just read the article that you qouted. I don't want to refute the Dawidowics article. It just unencyclopedic to plunge a quote, by someone who is not introduced, out of context, somewhere, without context. That is close to being a 'rant'. | | ::::* In this context the Dawidowicz was inappropiate. And if you are looking for some arguments against the dawidowicz quote, just read the article that you qouted. I don't want to refute the Dawidowics article. It just unencyclopedic to plunge a quote, by someone who is not introduced, out of context, somewhere, without context. That is close to being a 'rant'. |
| | :::::However, if you want to discuss the relative importance of gay victims, you can for example start with the fact that there where about 20000 or so gay victims (these numbers are by memory), which is not much compared to the 6 million dead jews, or 20 million dead russians. If you want to discuss it, discuss it with context. The way you dealt with it was bad, without context. From a long article describing the plight of homosexuals, you select the single sentence that rejects it. [[User:Order]] 5 April, 2:00 (AEST) | | :::::However, if you want to discuss the relative importance of gay victims, you can for example start with the fact that there where about 20000 or so gay victims (these numbers are by memory), which is not much compared to the 6 million dead jews, or 20 million dead russians. If you want to discuss it, discuss it with context. The way you dealt with it was bad, without context. From a long article describing the plight of homosexuals, you select the single sentence that rejects it. [[User:Order]] 5 April, 2:00 (AEST) |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::::You haven't said anything new here, and the discussion on Hitler/Talk was extensive, and beneficial to all involved. You did characterize Dawidowicz as a rant, and my insertion was in the Holocaust section. The quote is right here (as similiar claims throughout Conservapedia have appeared elsewhere), |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::::''He was responsible for the deaths of millions of Jews, many disabled persons, and homosexuals, along with many other groups, through the so-called "final solution". ''[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Adolf_Hitler&diff=47024&oldid=46637#Final_Solution] |
| | + | |
| | + | :::::: and I beleive we all undersand the Hitler article and others will not be used to promote the gay agenda for the false claim that "millions of homosexuals" were exterminated by Nazis, as "right-wing" "[[Dominionist]]s" also wish to do. |
| | + | |
| | + | ::::::I suspect you purposefully came here to impugn me as anti-Semitic and rally others to this sentiment. And in my personal view, this is an abuse of your editing priveleges. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:34, 4 April 2007 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | I unlocked Hitler. I locked it. What is the problem with it now, Order? Better than posting here, you know darn well how to get hold of me. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 22:12, 22 March 2007 (EDT) | | I unlocked Hitler. I locked it. What is the problem with it now, Order? Better than posting here, you know darn well how to get hold of me. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 22:12, 22 March 2007 (EDT) |