Difference between revisions of "Talk:5000 BC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GarbageMan (talk | contribs) (New page: ==Citing Sources== In accordance with the second Commandment of Conservapedia, where are the citations of the numbers given for world population growth during this time? Adding the word "m...) |
GarbageMan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Citing Sources== | ==Citing Sources== | ||
| − | In accordance with the second Commandment of Conservapedia, where are the citations of the numbers given for world population growth during this time? Adding the word "maybe" does not excuse the author from crediting his sources, and does not approach being acceptable for an encyclopedic entry in any case. Not only is there is also no citation of sources for the flourishing of cultures and animal husbandry or the spread of "copper ornaments", whatever those may or may not be; but there is also not so much as a specification of what is meant by these claims. This entry is laughable at best and should be deleted until a legitimate entry can be written. | + | In accordance with the second Commandment of Conservapedia, where are the citations of the numbers given for world population growth during this time? Adding the word "maybe" does not excuse the author from crediting his sources, and does not approach being acceptable for an encyclopedic entry in any case. Not only is there is also no citation of sources for the flourishing of cultures and animal husbandry or the spread of "copper ornaments", whatever those may or may not be; but there is also not so much as a specification of what is meant by these claims. This entry is laughable at best and should be deleted until a legitimate entry can be written. [[User:GarbageMan|GarbageMan]] 12:53, 4 April 2007 (CST) |
Latest revision as of 17:53, April 4, 2007
Citing Sources
In accordance with the second Commandment of Conservapedia, where are the citations of the numbers given for world population growth during this time? Adding the word "maybe" does not excuse the author from crediting his sources, and does not approach being acceptable for an encyclopedic entry in any case. Not only is there is also no citation of sources for the flourishing of cultures and animal husbandry or the spread of "copper ornaments", whatever those may or may not be; but there is also not so much as a specification of what is meant by these claims. This entry is laughable at best and should be deleted until a legitimate entry can be written. GarbageMan 12:53, 4 April 2007 (CST)