Difference between revisions of "Talk:Baraminology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(evidence for a classification system?) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Physical/genetic evidence for what exactly? The article is about a classification system. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:48, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | :Physical/genetic evidence for what exactly? The article is about a classification system. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:48, 3 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Physical/genetic evidence that the categories are meaningful distinctions, presumably. [[User:DrLib|DrLib]] 17:41, 4 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:41, April 4, 2007
This article is excellent, but I would like to know what sources the author used before I go in and editing. After all, perhaps he has better sources than I do. --Ashens 10:40 27 February 2007 (EST)
- The best reference to date is the review article "Baraminology -- Classification of Created Organisms", by Wayne Frair, Ph.D, Originally published in CRS Quarterly, Vol. 37, Num. 2, Sept. 2000. I have added this reference to the article. Dr. Richard Paley 14:09, 27 February 2007 (EST)
As someone well-trained in biology, I would be interested in more support for this theory, for instance, physical/genetic evidence. Thanks. Palmd001 11:20, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Physical/genetic evidence for what exactly? The article is about a classification system. Philip J. Rayment 07:48, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
- Physical/genetic evidence that the categories are meaningful distinctions, presumably. DrLib 17:41, 4 April 2007 (EDT)