Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberalism"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
::::Now if it were a cartoon of a Bean Burrito, or the like, that would be inappropriate.  I suggest you mind your actions, BOlsen....carefully.  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 22:13, 14 May 2009 (EDT)
 
::::Now if it were a cartoon of a Bean Burrito, or the like, that would be inappropriate.  I suggest you mind your actions, BOlsen....carefully.  --[[User:TK|'''₮K''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 22:13, 14 May 2009 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Good article but... ==
 +
 +
I was directed here by Addison after a query regarding US liberalism. This cleared up my understanding, thanks, but I fail to see what Hitler has to do with this? Very curious. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:38, 21 March 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 20:38, March 21, 2011

Political Cartoon Image

I don't think that political cartoons really belong in an encyclopedia, so I'm going to take the picture and replace it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:BOlsen (talk)

Do us a favor, stop thinking so hard.--Jpatt 21:20, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
So the picture should stay? I was simply saying that the picture didn't seem appropriate.BOlsen
Political cartoons are appropriate. You can suggest a picture with no guaranty of inclusion.--Jpatt 21:39, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
Now if it were a cartoon of a Bean Burrito, or the like, that would be inappropriate. I suggest you mind your actions, BOlsen....carefully. --₮K/Admin/Talk 22:13, 14 May 2009 (EDT)

Good article but...

I was directed here by Addison after a query regarding US liberalism. This cleared up my understanding, thanks, but I fail to see what Hitler has to do with this? Very curious. MaxFletcher 16:38, 21 March 2011 (EDT)