Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberalism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MaxFletcher (talk | contribs) (→Good article but...: new section) |
MaxFletcher (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I was directed here by Addison after a query regarding US liberalism. This cleared up my understanding, thanks, but I fail to see what Hitler has to do with this? Very curious. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:38, 21 March 2011 (EDT) | I was directed here by Addison after a query regarding US liberalism. This cleared up my understanding, thanks, but I fail to see what Hitler has to do with this? Very curious. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:38, 21 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :I am hesitant to make a wholesale change to this page but the section in question directs to a page with thew exact same information. Should it be a "See also"? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:41, 21 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:41, March 21, 2011
Political Cartoon Image
I don't think that political cartoons really belong in an encyclopedia, so I'm going to take the picture and replace it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:BOlsen (talk)
- Do us a favor, stop thinking so hard.--Jpatt 21:20, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
- So the picture should stay? I was simply saying that the picture didn't seem appropriate.BOlsen
- Political cartoons are appropriate. You can suggest a picture with no guaranty of inclusion.--Jpatt 21:39, 11 May 2009 (EDT)
Good article but...
I was directed here by Addison after a query regarding US liberalism. This cleared up my understanding, thanks, but I fail to see what Hitler has to do with this? Very curious. MaxFletcher 16:38, 21 March 2011 (EDT)
- I am hesitant to make a wholesale change to this page but the section in question directs to a page with thew exact same information. Should it be a "See also"? MaxFletcher 16:41, 21 March 2011 (EDT)