Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 3:
Line 3: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 197:
Line 224: − − === Abortion === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Abortion]] − − === Anti-Christianity === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Anti-Christianity]] − − === Conservapedia smears === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservapedia smears]] − − === Conservative personalities and politicians === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservative Personalities]] − − === Global warming === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Global warming]] − − === Homosexuality === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Homosexuality]] − − === Liberal Politicians === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Liberal Politicians]] − − === Obama === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Obama]] − − === Science and Evolution === − See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Science and Evolution]]
Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:56, April 6, 2011
, 03:56, April 6, 2011→Examples of Bias: Format
==Examples of Bias ==
==Examples of Bias ==
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
=== Abortion ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Abortion]]
=== Anti-Christianity ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Anti-Christianity]]
=== Conservapedia smears ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservapedia smears]]
=== Conservative personalities and politicians ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conservative Personalities]]
=== Global warming ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Global warming]]
=== Homosexuality ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Homosexuality]]
=== Liberal Politicians ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Liberal Politicians]]
=== Obama ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Obama]]
=== Science and Evolution ===
See [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Science and Evolution]]
=== General/Uncategorized ===
=== General/Uncategorized ===
The issue seems to be because there is an descriptive article where liberal gatekeepers are responsible for "defining" what "radical right-wing" means, but not a matching one that has been successfully created for "radical left-wing", where Code Pink would likely fall. There is only a more tame "far-left" to use, which stops short of radical left-wing tactics--[[User:CenterRight|CenterRight]] 19:33, 31 December 2010 (EST)</blockquote>
The issue seems to be because there is an descriptive article where liberal gatekeepers are responsible for "defining" what "radical right-wing" means, but not a matching one that has been successfully created for "radical left-wing", where Code Pink would likely fall. There is only a more tame "far-left" to use, which stops short of radical left-wing tactics--[[User:CenterRight|CenterRight]] 19:33, 31 December 2010 (EST)</blockquote>
== Humorous quotes relating to bias and Wikipedia ==
== Humorous quotes relating to bias and Wikipedia ==