Difference between revisions of "User talk:Britinme"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Let me see what I can do...I can expand on failure rate, but you have to be careful about how you massage statistics. For instance, if 3 out of 100 women will get pregnant using it, that ...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Let me see what I can do...I can expand on failure rate, but you have to be careful about how you massage statistics.  For instance, if 3 out of 100 women will get pregnant using it, that does not mean that after 2 years,  6 out of 100 will.  Trying to apply in aggregate is bad stats.  If you have someone you know who is good with stats, that would be great.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 20:47, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Let me see what I can do...I can expand on failure rate, but you have to be careful about how you massage statistics.  For instance, if 3 out of 100 women will get pregnant using it, that does not mean that after 2 years,  6 out of 100 will.  Trying to apply in aggregate is bad stats.  If you have someone you know who is good with stats, that would be great.--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]<sup>[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]</sup> 20:47, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Thanks - I've left a message on your talk page for you. [[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 21:50 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 01:51, April 5, 2007

Let me see what I can do...I can expand on failure rate, but you have to be careful about how you massage statistics. For instance, if 3 out of 100 women will get pregnant using it, that does not mean that after 2 years, 6 out of 100 will. Trying to apply in aggregate is bad stats. If you have someone you know who is good with stats, that would be great.--PalMDtalk 20:47, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

Thanks - I've left a message on your talk page for you. Britinme 21:50 4 April 2007 (EDT)