Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,949
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 02:20, April 5, 2007
, 02:20, April 5, 2007→...and about the math...: another kenard
::Furthermore, "liberal bias" on Wikipedia is not defined by the number of liberals in the group, it is defined by the liberal bias of their edits. If you claim that liberals can't edit without significant bias, than you claim that conservatives can't either. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 21:52, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
::Furthermore, "liberal bias" on Wikipedia is not defined by the number of liberals in the group, it is defined by the liberal bias of their edits. If you claim that liberals can't edit without significant bias, than you claim that conservatives can't either. --[[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]<sup>([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])</sup> 21:52, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
*''liberals won't admit any liberal bias''
:Indeed; there's no evidence for this claim at [[Liberal]];
*''Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded. ''
:I just haven't got aroud to disposing of this kenard, yet. But when I do, the libs themselves will agree as well. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 22:20, 4 April 2007 (EDT)