170
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + + + +
→Ok this just isnt true
HarabecW
HarabecW
:If you can prove beyond doubt that wicca had absolutely nothing to do with each of the crimes detailed in these stories, then we'll remove the links in question. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:57, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
:If you can prove beyond doubt that wicca had absolutely nothing to do with each of the crimes detailed in these stories, then we'll remove the links in question. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:57, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
That can easily be demonstrated by pointing out that the vast majority of Wiccans DONT kill people. Indicating the behavior of a tiny fraction of a specific group is not proof against the entire group itself. That, I would have thought, should be obvious. If people start murdering Hostess Brands executives because they feel Twinkies are poisoning people, should we then indict Twinkies as being responsible for murder?
In all of the articles, Wicca is mentioned as a feature of one of the participants and has no bearing on the actual event or the crime was carried out by someone with undeniably clear mental health problems in which case their religious views are irrelevant.
HarabecW