Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Locks and Blocks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks Discussion: example) |
(→Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks Discussion: delete anything I write which looks silly) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Wouldn't "''...it comes right at the end of the Bible where you can't miss it''" in the article [[Fornication]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fornication&oldid=86794] be considered ''[[silliness]]'' or is that ''[[ideology]]''? | :Wouldn't "''...it comes right at the end of the Bible where you can't miss it''" in the article [[Fornication]] [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fornication&oldid=86794] be considered ''[[silliness]]'' or is that ''[[ideology]]''? | ||
:[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 07:58, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | :[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 07:58, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Your comment is in the wrong place, but that's okay: it got my attention. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::You are free to delete anything I write which looks silly to you. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 08:10, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 12:10, April 5, 2007
Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks Discussion
we do not block for ideological reasons ... but for silliness what happens when someone decides that someone else's ideology is silliness? WhatIsG0ing0n 07:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- Wouldn't "...it comes right at the end of the Bible where you can't miss it" in the article Fornication [1] be considered silliness or is that ideology?
- WhatIsG0ing0n 07:58, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- Your comment is in the wrong place, but that's okay: it got my attention.
- You are free to delete anything I write which looks silly to you. --Ed Poor 08:10, 5 April 2007 (EDT)