Difference between revisions of "User talk:HarabecW"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservajoke (talk | contribs) |
(Undo revision 868598 by Conservajoke (talk)) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == [[Wicca]] == | ||
| + | Please wait for an answer to your request before deleting material. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 11:08, 7 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | HarabecW, all I see you doing now is slipping in fact tags or removing information; I saw very little improving done to the Wicca article, which you said you would do. We are here to build up an encyclopedia, not take it down. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:40, 8 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tagging is improving the site. It lets people know where things need to be removed, added, or changed. And I cant seem to make any changes without getting yelled at by someone that I'm stepping on their turf. I have also doubled the size of the Wicca article and improved it's accuracy greatly. I am contributing plenty. -HarabecW | ||
Revision as of 18:14, May 13, 2011
Wicca
Please wait for an answer to your request before deleting material. --Joaquín Martínez 11:08, 7 May 2011 (EDT)
HarabecW, all I see you doing now is slipping in fact tags or removing information; I saw very little improving done to the Wicca article, which you said you would do. We are here to build up an encyclopedia, not take it down. Karajou 17:40, 8 May 2011 (EDT)
Tagging is improving the site. It lets people know where things need to be removed, added, or changed. And I cant seem to make any changes without getting yelled at by someone that I'm stepping on their turf. I have also doubled the size of the Wicca article and improved it's accuracy greatly. I am contributing plenty. -HarabecW