Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Locks and Blocks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks Discussion: 765 pages watched) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:::I kinda noticed when you start stuff you return to see what's happened to it;-) | :::I kinda noticed when you start stuff you return to see what's happened to it;-) | ||
:::[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 08:23, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | :::[[User:WhatIsG0ing0n|WhatIsG0ing0n]] 08:23, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::My watchlist has 765 pages watched not counting talk pages. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 09:32, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:32, April 5, 2007
Conservapedia:Locks and Blocks Discussion
we do not block for ideological reasons ... but for silliness what happens when someone decides that someone else's ideology is silliness? WhatIsG0ing0n 07:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- Wouldn't "...it comes right at the end of the Bible where you can't miss it" in the article Fornication [1] be considered silliness or is that ideology?
- WhatIsG0ing0n 07:58, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- Your comment is in the wrong place, but that's okay: it got my attention.
- You are free to delete anything I write which looks silly to you. --Ed Poor 08:10, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- I kinda noticed when you start stuff you return to see what's happened to it;-)
- WhatIsG0ing0n 08:23, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
- My watchlist has 765 pages watched not counting talk pages. --Ed Poor 09:32, 5 April 2007 (EDT)