Difference between revisions of "User talk:Iduan"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (fix format)
(Blanked the page)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{User talk:Iduan/header}}
 
−
{| style="background:navy;text-align:center" width="100%"
 
−
|-
 
−
|style="background:white; border: 2px solid maroon; font-weight:bold; font-variant:small-caps"|<div class="horizontal">
 
−
*2007
 
−
*[[/Archive1|(August)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive2|(September)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive3|(October)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive4|(November)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive5|(December)]]<br/>
 
−
*2008
 
−
*[[/Archive6|(January)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive7|(February)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive8|(August)]]<br/>
 
−
*2009
 
−
*[[/Archive9|(January)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive10|(February)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive11|(March)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive12|(April)]]<br/>
 
−
*2010
 
−
*[[/Archive13|(January)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive14|(June)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive15|(July)]]<br/>
 
−
*2011
 
−
*[[/Archive16|(March)]]
 
−
*[[/Archive17|(April)]]
 
  
−
</div>
 
−
|}
 
−
 
−
==Editing Liberal Friendship==
 
−
The edits were to correct erroneous information, remove opinion, and to put tags in to get citations for claims that were unsourced. I was under the impression that's what we do with an encyclopedia. This site isnt here to smear people. HarabecW
 
−
:First of all please sign your posts with <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> - it'll leave an automatic time-stamped signature. Secondly, this is an encyclopedia written from a [[conservative]] perspective - that's crucial for you to understand if you want to continue editing here. Thirdly, unless you have very good reason you do not revert administrators, and lastly, if you are reverted - the correct response is NOT to revert back - that's called edit warring - you've done it twice now (with Karajou and with me) and I'm quite willing to take punitive measures if you do it again.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 17:36, 8 May 2011 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
I apologize if I went about correcting something in the wrong way, but I fail to see how this being a conservative site matters. If you want an encyclopedia, then you dont get to play cut and paste with factual events and ideas if you want to call this site an encyclopedia, as it clearly does. --[[User:HarabecW|HarabecW]] 16:04, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
:Read the Conservapedia Commandments, but also - just in general - if you have multiple users with block rights (Karajou actually being a sysop) reverting you, then you're doing something wrong.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 18:00, 12 May 2011 (EDT)
 
−
 
−
== my edit ==
 
−
You do know that you should include Nixon acts for the Enviroment. It seems that any things that even sounds liberal you delete even of it is a fact. You can't slant facts. As I don't have as much time as you seem to have you should also include he ended the draft.{{unsigned|Conservative134}}
 
−
:Congress ended the draft, not Nixon.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 15:10, 11 May 2011 (EDT)
 
−
I reverted you ([http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Richard_Nixon&diff=next&oldid=867509 here]) not for your content but because you very clearly copied from Wikipedia.  You even left in the citation number  (that stray "[108]"? I know what that is). So, again, let's be clear, I reverted your edit because it was careless plagiarism - it had nothing to do with content censorship. Also, new sections go on the bottom of talk pages and you should sign your edits (<nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki>).--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 16:01, 11 May 2011 (EDT)
 

Revision as of 21:36, May 17, 2011

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Iduan&oldid=869905"