Changes

283 bytes added ,  15:17, April 5, 2007
Line 424: Line 424:     
*So, in order to maintain ''order'', and spare anyone's feelings being hurt, you are willing to deny freedom of speech?  Article pages should be factual, however to restrain free thought on the talk pages, so long as not sexually explicit or profanity, seems a bit whacked.  --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:58, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
 
*So, in order to maintain ''order'', and spare anyone's feelings being hurt, you are willing to deny freedom of speech?  Article pages should be factual, however to restrain free thought on the talk pages, so long as not sexually explicit or profanity, seems a bit whacked.  --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:58, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
:Ok, I get it, so long as someone doesn't use sexually explicit or profanity on talk pages it's free speech. I'll remember that whenever someone complains about Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]<sup>[[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]]</sup> 11:17, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
11,789

edits