Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
→Religious Tolerance Breeds Empathy: clarification from a sysop
*So, in order to maintain ''order'', and spare anyone's feelings being hurt, you are willing to deny freedom of speech? Article pages should be factual, however to restrain free thought on the talk pages, so long as not sexually explicit or profanity, seems a bit whacked. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:58, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
*So, in order to maintain ''order'', and spare anyone's feelings being hurt, you are willing to deny freedom of speech? Article pages should be factual, however to restrain free thought on the talk pages, so long as not sexually explicit or profanity, seems a bit whacked. --~ [[User:TK|TerryK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 20:58, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
:Ok, I get it, so long as someone doesn't use sexually explicit or profanity on talk pages it's free speech. I'll remember that whenever someone complains about Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]<sup>[[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]]</sup> 11:17, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
:Ok, I get it, so long as someone doesn't use sexually explicit or profanity on talk pages it's free speech. I'll remember that whenever someone complains about Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]]<sup>[[User Talk:Crocoite|talk]]</sup> 11:17, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
::This is not precise enough. The point is to focus your comments on improvements to the article. You can also chime in on any of our [[Debate topics]] or start one of your own. I won't stand for violations of [[free speech]]. Sysop [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 13:18, 5 April 2007 (EDT)