Changes

Common descent (view source)

Revision as of 17:35, April 5, 2007

5 bytes added , 17:35, April 5, 2007

m

link

Line 30: Line 30:

</blockquote>

−

Creationist scientists have written regarding the nature of Haeckel's work and how a prestigious German science journal published a work that they believe was invalid.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i2/haeckel.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/747</ref>

+

Creationist scientists have written regarding the nature of [[Haeckel]]'s work and how a prestigious German science journal published a work that they believe was invalid.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v18/i2/haeckel.asp</ref><ref>http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/747</ref>

Most textbooks used in modern biology classes use photographs of real embryos now rather than the drawings. <ref>http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/wells/haeckel.html</ref>

+

==References==

British cons

444

edits