Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal quotient"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MountainDew (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== 80%? == | == 80%? == | ||
A source for that might do nicely. [[User:DrLib|DrLib]] 14:08, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | A source for that might do nicely. [[User:DrLib|DrLib]] 14:08, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Liberal quotient of Conservapedia== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Not counting the vandals, I'm genuinely curious what our liberal quotient is. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 14:13, 5 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:13, April 5, 2007
What a fabulous Encyclopedia entry, with entries like this I don't see why no one is using this site?
Fantastic!! This means we now have a wonderful new method of assessing Conservative Bias, and for the first time it is measurable. To calculate the Conservative Quotient (CQ), all one has to do is to know the Liberal Quotient (LQ), then apply the formula: CQ = 1 - LQ.
A rating above zero presumably means that there is Conservative Bias?
Shurely Shome mishtake?
--CatWatcher 13:39, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
80%?
A source for that might do nicely. DrLib 14:08, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
Liberal quotient of Conservapedia
Not counting the vandals, I'm genuinely curious what our liberal quotient is. MountainDew 14:13, 5 April 2007 (EDT)