767
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 18:17, April 5, 2007
, 18:17, April 5, 2007→More bias
:You can refer to people however you like. That's your right, I'm not going to deny it. What I'm wondering is if Conservapedia wants to be known as ethnocentric and derogatory. Is that what conservapedia wants? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 14:04, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
:You can refer to people however you like. That's your right, I'm not going to deny it. What I'm wondering is if Conservapedia wants to be known as ethnocentric and derogatory. Is that what conservapedia wants? [[User:Myk|Myk]] 14:04, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
It's your ''opinion'' that those words are ethnocentric and derogatory. It's my opinion that that this assertion of yours is not only derogatory toward me and inflammatory toward Conservapedia, but that this type of name-calling is a tactic that has been used by liberals to great effect to guide the public debate.
It is true that by labeling someone a racist for using the world "niggardly" (NOT a racist term by the way) you can force an apology. It is true that by having a bunch of misguided college students hold up placards you can force Ted Turner to apologize for remarks that he intended as compliments. But this tactic is beginning to ring hollow with some. Therefore, calling me names won't change my thoughts or mind. I know my heart and my life. However, I will defend your right to think and say what you think. I sincerely hope you can allow me the same right. I hope that Conservapedia doesn't kowtow (pun intended) to your name-calling tactics. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 14:17, 5 April 2007 (EDT)