152
edits
Changes
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 18:19, April 5, 2007
, 18:19, April 5, 2007no edit summary
Your characterization of what happened doesn't mean that is the actualization of what happened. However, you are certainly free to ''think'' that's what happened. Therefore, you do have freedom of thought. On the other hand, we cannot act without impunity. Actions can be limited or rendered by a higher authority. (That authority, by the way, can be reduced, replaced or eliminated if the authority is not used in a just manner.) I'm quite sure the authority acted in a just manner. Therefore, you've provided a perfect example of conservative principals in action. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 14:05, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
Your characterization of what happened doesn't mean that is the actualization of what happened. However, you are certainly free to ''think'' that's what happened. Therefore, you do have freedom of thought. On the other hand, we cannot act without impunity. Actions can be limited or rendered by a higher authority. (That authority, by the way, can be reduced, replaced or eliminated if the authority is not used in a just manner.) I'm quite sure the authority acted in a just manner. Therefore, you've provided a perfect example of conservative principals in action. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 14:05, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
:Um, its in my discussion page, and its not so much my interpretation as my basically stating what Aschlafly told me. That I was being threatened with a ban for saying that I don't implicitly trust the opinion of a man with such a bad grasp of mathematics. I honestly don't, and am not being sarcastic. Check, please, if you care to. So if you think that the situation (and now just my presentation of it) is the perfect example of conservative principals in action, then youre basically saying that a core principal is expelling dissenters, right? If I'm wrong, please explain.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 14:19, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
: Folks, this is a serious site. We mean it. One more example of silly sarcasm here will result in an account block. I'm not kidding and I'm tired of wasting time on this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
: Folks, this is a serious site. We mean it. One more example of silly sarcasm here will result in an account block. I'm not kidding and I'm tired of wasting time on this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)