2
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + + + + + +
Debate:Should Creationism/Intelligent design be taught as a scientific alternative to evolution in public schools? (view source)
Revision as of 18:59, April 5, 2007
, 18:59, April 5, 2007→'''Post Your Thoughts'''
=='''Post Your Thoughts'''==
=='''Post Your Thoughts'''==
==='''Teach Science As Science And Philosophy As Philosophy'''===
There seems to be an inherent contradiction in the notion that the existence of god/the mystical creation of life can be pursued as a scientific discipline, or something that could be taught as such a discipline. They most fundamental requirement of Christianity is faith, a belief in God and submission.
To pursue creationism or ID as a science or near-science is to throw aside faith in the search for logical underpinnings to the development of life. To me, that seems like a contradiction.
==='''Teach Them Everything'''===
==='''Teach Them Everything'''===