Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
568
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + + + +
no edit summary
The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
The argument assumes that something has to meet the definition of god. otherwise the conclusion would not follow. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim <small>(CPAdmin1)</small>]]<sup>[[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]]</sup> 12:37, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
== Criticism, counter-criticism ==
Is not the ideal which is God made sensible by the fact that the principle of deductive logic cannot itself be deduced (it must, like ontological arguments for God, be assumed in order to be proved) ? [[User:PatternOfPersona|PatternOfPersona]] 18:05, 5 June 2011 (EDT)