Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dan Savage"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "If the subject matter is approved, should I link to Dan Savage's blog? The Stranger's advertisements often include call girls and such, and Savage's blog is often about sex....") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the subject matter is approved, should I link to Dan Savage's blog? [[The Stranger]]'s advertisements often include call girls and such, and Savage's blog is often about sex. I hesitate, since I know linking from here would be straying from CP's family-friendly intent, but at the same time, it's kind of an important link. He doesn't have another site, to my knowledge.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 11:50, 6 June 2011 (EDT) | If the subject matter is approved, should I link to Dan Savage's blog? [[The Stranger]]'s advertisements often include call girls and such, and Savage's blog is often about sex. I hesitate, since I know linking from here would be straying from CP's family-friendly intent, but at the same time, it's kind of an important link. He doesn't have another site, to my knowledge.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 11:50, 6 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :It is not appropriate to discuss any of the important details of this disgusting man or the Santorum business on this website. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 12:42, 6 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:42, June 6, 2011
If the subject matter is approved, should I link to Dan Savage's blog? The Stranger's advertisements often include call girls and such, and Savage's blog is often about sex. I hesitate, since I know linking from here would be straying from CP's family-friendly intent, but at the same time, it's kind of an important link. He doesn't have another site, to my knowledge.--CamilleT 11:50, 6 June 2011 (EDT)
- It is not appropriate to discuss any of the important details of this disgusting man or the Santorum business on this website. Nate 12:42, 6 June 2011 (EDT)