Automoderated users, edit
140
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 820:
Line 820: +
Talk:Counterexamples to an Old Earth (view source)
Revision as of 04:13, June 17, 2011
, 04:13, June 17, 2011→Diminishing intelligence, etc.
::::::The rate of decline need not be constant, and nothing in the counterexample implies that it would be. But it's continuous and differentiable -- surely not a step function.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:06, 17 June 2011 (EDT)
::::::The rate of decline need not be constant, and nothing in the counterexample implies that it would be. But it's continuous and differentiable -- surely not a step function.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:06, 17 June 2011 (EDT)
:::::::You have provided no evidence that the rate has always been negative. Would an increase in intelligence be evidence for or against a young earth? [[User:BradB|BradB]] 00:13, 17 June 2011 (EDT)