Changes

{{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 12:27, 22 June 2011 (EDT)}}

{{welcome|sig=[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 12:27, 22 June 2011 (EDT)}}

:You hit the nail on the head; it is an unexplicable - ''unexplainable'' - evolutionary step backward.  In order to properly explain this animal, evolutionists have to explain a reason for it to get these claws back, which means giving the hoatzin an intelligence it doesn't possess.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 11:48, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

:You hit the nail on the head; it is an unexplicable - ''unexplainable'' - evolutionary step backward.  In order to properly explain this animal, evolutionists have to explain a reason for it to get these claws back, which means giving the hoatzin an intelligence it doesn't possess.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 11:48, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

::Thanks for clearing things up for me. I added a few words to the article to make it clearer for everyone WHY such a feature goes against Evolution, but I still believe that it would be nice to expand on it, and to give this matter its own paragraph in the article, eventually. It is not a high priority, of course. --[[User:LeonardO|Leo-from-UK]] 11:59, 22 June 2011 (EDT)

::Thanks for clearing things up for me. I added a few words to the article to make it clearer for everyone WHY such a feature goes against Evolution, but I still believe that it would be nice to expand on it, and to give this matter its own paragraph in the article, eventually. It is not a high priority, of course. --[[User:LeonardO|Leo-from-UK]] 11:59, 22 June 2011 (EDT)