Difference between revisions of "User talk:Britinme"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
That would be because I posted the original. This is the very long version of something I wrote in a much shortened version for another project completely (related to the QI site, of which I am a moderator). I edited it somewhat for this site, to make it more encyclopaedic in expression, and added some additional info I'd gleaned since then. Lobsters are remarkably fascinating creatures. If there's any copyright on it, it belongs to me. [[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 21:57 5 April (EDT). | That would be because I posted the original. This is the very long version of something I wrote in a much shortened version for another project completely (related to the QI site, of which I am a moderator). I edited it somewhat for this site, to make it more encyclopaedic in expression, and added some additional info I'd gleaned since then. Lobsters are remarkably fascinating creatures. If there's any copyright on it, it belongs to me. [[User:Britinme|Britinme]] 21:57 5 April (EDT). | ||
| − | *OK. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:57, 6 April 2007 (EDT) | + | *OK. Please consider it a compliment: whenever I see that a new article, freshly created, looks like a finished product, I always Google to see whether it could have been copied from somewhere else. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 05:57, 6 April 2007 (EDT) [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 08:18, 6 April 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 12:18, April 6, 2007
Let me see what I can do...I can expand on failure rate, but you have to be careful about how you massage statistics. For instance, if 3 out of 100 women will get pregnant using it, that does not mean that after 2 years, 6 out of 100 will. Trying to apply in aggregate is bad stats. If you have someone you know who is good with stats, that would be great.--PalMDtalk 20:47, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks - I've left a message on your talk page for you. Britinme 21:50 4 April 2007 (EDT)
Lobster article
Seems very similar to this posting. Comments? Dpbsmith 21:48, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
That would be because I posted the original. This is the very long version of something I wrote in a much shortened version for another project completely (related to the QI site, of which I am a moderator). I edited it somewhat for this site, to make it more encyclopaedic in expression, and added some additional info I'd gleaned since then. Lobsters are remarkably fascinating creatures. If there's any copyright on it, it belongs to me. Britinme 21:57 5 April (EDT).