Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Featured articles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below. | Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below. | ||
* [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 12:17, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | * [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 12:17, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | * --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 12:23, 17 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:23, July 17, 2011
Need some help
We need some help cleaing up the mainspace here. Then we can get to organizing a committee. Rob Smith 23:34, 16 July 2011 (EDT)
- Good idea. --Joaquín Martínez 09:12, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- I think it would be great if this could be implemented again, so that Conservapedia can feature decent, educational, informative articles created by members of the project, instead of the semi-coherent ramblings of somebody who for all intents and purposes appears to be trying to harm Conservapedia's image. I mean, to go from some of the great articles listed here, to dribble about walruses and dancing girls... the mind boggles. TracyS 11:20, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
Sign up for Featured article committee
Volunteers please mark with an asterisk and sign below.
- TracyS 12:17, 17 July 2011 (EDT)
- --Joaquín Martínez 12:23, 17 July 2011 (EDT)