Difference between revisions of "Talk:Common law"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I have expanded this definition.  Also, it seemed overly focussed on the US so I have edited those references out.  If you are talking about the common law you are talking about a substantial number of countries which includes the US.  The common law does not centre on the US.  In fact the US is probably somewhat isolated from other common law jurisdictions.--[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:04, 22 February 2007 (EST)
 
I have expanded this definition.  Also, it seemed overly focussed on the US so I have edited those references out.  If you are talking about the common law you are talking about a substantial number of countries which includes the US.  The common law does not centre on the US.  In fact the US is probably somewhat isolated from other common law jurisdictions.--[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:04, 22 February 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
== Precedent rather than statute ==
 +
 +
I have removed the sentence contained in the introductory paragraph that stated that the common law was a system that worked on precedent as opposed to statute because that concept is dealt with as one of the three meanings that are referred to in the dot points below.  --[[User:JarradD|JarradD]] 19:00, 27 July 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 23:00, July 27, 2011

I have expanded this definition. Also, it seemed overly focussed on the US so I have edited those references out. If you are talking about the common law you are talking about a substantial number of countries which includes the US. The common law does not centre on the US. In fact the US is probably somewhat isolated from other common law jurisdictions.--Horace 19:04, 22 February 2007 (EST)

Precedent rather than statute

I have removed the sentence contained in the introductory paragraph that stated that the common law was a system that worked on precedent as opposed to statute because that concept is dealt with as one of the three meanings that are referred to in the dot points below. --JarradD 19:00, 27 July 2011 (EDT)