Difference between revisions of "User talk:LowKey"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If you didn't suddenly destroy a conversation--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:35, 28 July 2011 (EDT) | If you didn't suddenly destroy a conversation--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:35, 28 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
:Conservapedia has a policy against negative personal comments. LowKey was within his rights to remediate that unseemly conversation. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 10:47, 28 July 2011 (EDT) | :Conservapedia has a policy against negative personal comments. LowKey was within his rights to remediate that unseemly conversation. [[User:NKeaton|Nate]] 10:47, 28 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::And we all know that conversation isnt going to go away because a user decided to replace a bunch of comments with "personal attack removed". Besides, If they are personal attacks, that would be hiding the evidence they existed, forcing a judging synop to go through the history to see the original remarks,. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 10:56, 28 July 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:56, July 28, 2011
I think we would all appreciate it
If you didn't suddenly destroy a conversation--SeanS 10:35, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
- Conservapedia has a policy against negative personal comments. LowKey was within his rights to remediate that unseemly conversation. Nate 10:47, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
- And we all know that conversation isnt going to go away because a user decided to replace a bunch of comments with "personal attack removed". Besides, If they are personal attacks, that would be hiding the evidence they existed, forcing a judging synop to go through the history to see the original remarks,. --SeanS 10:56, 28 July 2011 (EDT)