Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Conservative point of view (CPOV)"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(good stuff.)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Good stuff.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 19:01, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
 
Good stuff.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 19:01, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
:I'm interested to see what becomes of this.  [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&oldid=881800#Linnaean_taxonomy Ed Poor told me] Conservapedia describes all points of view, and I took that to mean that a Conservative point of view is by no means the standard.  Of course, it wouldn't be the first time I misinterpreted someone.
 +
 +
:Nevertheless, this will make it easier for me decide on which tone to use while editing.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 23:54, 29 July 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:54, July 30, 2011

Good stuff.--JamesWilson 19:01, 29 July 2011 (EDT)

I'm interested to see what becomes of this. Ed Poor told me Conservapedia describes all points of view, and I took that to mean that a Conservative point of view is by no means the standard. Of course, it wouldn't be the first time I misinterpreted someone.
Nevertheless, this will make it easier for me decide on which tone to use while editing.--CamilleT 23:54, 29 July 2011 (EDT)