Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dufrane"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by PaulyS (talk) to last revision by Karajou)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Sounds like someone failed science class! Karajou, a scientific theory is as good as fact, and the bull passed around on here as fact is much closer to opinion than any thing scientists present.
 
−
 
 
Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific ''theory'' as if it's a ''fact''.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
 
Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific ''theory'' as if it's a ''fact''.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
  
 
If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times?  It's pretty easy, as you already know.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
 
If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times?  It's pretty easy, as you already know.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 19:24, August 1, 2011

Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific theory as if it's a fact. Karajou 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT)

If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times? It's pretty easy, as you already know. Karajou 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT)