154
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 61:
Line 61: + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Featured articles (view source)
Revision as of 15:44, August 2, 2011
, 15:44, August 2, 2011Question Evolution article is a good example of what we should not be featuring?
:I will have Rob take a look at it. As for Featured Article v. Article of the Week, I don't think it really matters.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 10:56, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
:I will have Rob take a look at it. As for Featured Article v. Article of the Week, I don't think it really matters.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 10:56, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
::Good suggestions, I'm on it. Let me now if the formatting still messed up. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:59, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
::Good suggestions, I'm on it. Let me now if the formatting still messed up. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 11:59, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
== Question Evolution article ==
I note that the current Article of the Month is an article about an obscure YouTuber's personal 'campaign', and that every single edit to the article itself was written by one user, User:Conservative. Yet again we had another silly article, written entirely by him, and it is something we are supposedly "featuring". It seems our attempts to maintain a higher standard of article to feature is not proceeding so well in the face of that user's dominance of the Main Page. Is there a way to recommend removal of articles as well as suggest better articles to feature? [[User:JanW|JanW]] 11:44, 2 August 2011 (EDT)