Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Delete"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'How would we feel about changing this template to <div style="width: 70%; margin: 0 15% 1em 15%; text-align: center; background-color: #DEE6ED; padding: 0.5em; border: solid 1px...') |
(→Nominating this for deletion/merging: new section) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
That way, it would be more clear to the reader that the article may be so flawed as to merit deletion. The current template is unobtrusive, and so readers might not notice this important information. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 03:52, 23 December 2009 (EST) | That way, it would be more clear to the reader that the article may be so flawed as to merit deletion. The current template is unobtrusive, and so readers might not notice this important information. [[User:JacobB|JacobB]] 03:52, 23 December 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Nominating this for deletion/merging == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Conservapedia got rid of its AFD process years ago (a very short time after users introduced it) since all deletions decisions are made solely by the administrators to avoid evil liberals from taking over the site (this was pretty much the verbatim reasoning back then). | ||
| + | |||
| + | So let's just change over the current "candidates" to <nowiki>{{speedy}}</nowiki> unless they're salvageable and erase this template. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 21:22, 6 August 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:22, August 7, 2011
How would we feel about changing this template to
This article has been proposed for deletion. Discuss the matter at Conservapedia:AFD Delete.
That way, it would be more clear to the reader that the article may be so flawed as to merit deletion. The current template is unobtrusive, and so readers might not notice this important information. JacobB 03:52, 23 December 2009 (EST)
Nominating this for deletion/merging
Conservapedia got rid of its AFD process years ago (a very short time after users introduced it) since all deletions decisions are made solely by the administrators to avoid evil liberals from taking over the site (this was pretty much the verbatim reasoning back then).
So let's just change over the current "candidates" to {{speedy}} unless they're salvageable and erase this template. --Sid 3050 21:22, 6 August 2011 (EDT)