Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gilbert Stuart"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply to Joaquin)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
:: Since it is in part a copy, it is an original Stuart work and must be credited. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 18:35, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 
:: Since it is in part a copy, it is an original Stuart work and must be credited. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] 18:35, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Credited, yes, but I don't believe it belongs on Stuart's page. It would be better to include the original instead. See [http://www.gilbert-stuart.org/Martha-Washington-(The-Athenaeum-Portrait).html here]. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 22:42, 8 August 2011 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 02:42, August 9, 2011

I am removing the painting of Martha Washington. While it was based on a head-and-shoulders painting by Stuart, this portrait was actually painted by Eliphalet Frazer Andrews in 1878. [1]

Based on a Gilbert Stuart painting does not make it a Gilbert Stuart painting. You are absolutely correct. Karajou 13:10, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
Since it is in part a copy, it is an original Stuart work and must be credited. --Joaquín Martínez 18:35, 8 August 2011 (EDT)
Credited, yes, but I don't believe it belongs on Stuart's page. It would be better to include the original instead. See here. --SharonW 22:42, 8 August 2011 (EDT)