Changes

Legacy of Alger Hiss (view source)

Revision as of 20:55, August 9, 2011

188 bytes added , 20:55, August 9, 2011

→‎Scholarly consensus: updated dead link

Line 18: Line 18:

==Scholarly consensus==

−

Today, reports [[Oxford University]]'s ''Oxonian Review'', "the Hiss case is one issue upon which [http://www.oxonianreview.org/wp/who-killed-alger-hiss/ consensus transcends ideological divides]." After decades of debate, "[http://www.nybooks.com/articles/118 no serious scholar] of the subject any longer dismisses the voluminous and explicit claims by [[Whittaker Chambers]] and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]," writes [https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/summer00/art02.html Cold War specialist] Thomas Powers. By 2006, "[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/apr/08/russia.davidsmith most historians] had come to the conclusion that Hiss was probably guilty," agrees Aldrich. "Those who have studied the Hiss case by and large believe that he was guilty of perjury and quite likely also guilty of espionage, that is, of passing government documents to the Soviets," concur Gilbert Geis [http://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/ggeis of the University of California, Irvine] and Leigh B. Bienen [http://homicide.northwestern.edu/about/LeighBienen/ of Northwestern].<ref>Gilbert Geis and Leigh B. Bienen, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=FPRslbPnMjwC Crimes of the Century: From Leopold and Loeb to O.J. Simpson]'' (Lebanon, N.H.: UPNE, 1998), ISBN 1555533604, pp. 130-131</ref> [http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~davidgr/ Rutgers historian] David Greenberg refers to "the [http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/16/technology/online-the-hiss-defense-doesn-t-rest.html?pagewanted=all dwindling band] of those who believe in Hiss"; "the ~~[http://www.nyu.edu/library/bobst/research/tam/hiss_david_oshinsky.pdf vast~~ majority] of modern American historians today and particularly those specializing in domestic Cold War," concludes [http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTk5Y2ZmNTQ3NWUyZGQwMTZhZjQxYTRkZjZhNGNmZDM liberal historian] David Oshinsky, "see evidence pointing overwhelmingly to Hiss being guilty as charged.”

+

Today, reports [[Oxford University]]'s ''Oxonian Review'', "the Hiss case is one issue upon which [http://www.oxonianreview.org/wp/who-killed-alger-hiss/ consensus transcends ideological divides]." After decades of debate, "[http://www.nybooks.com/articles/118 no serious scholar] of the subject any longer dismisses the voluminous and explicit claims by [[Whittaker Chambers]] and [[Elizabeth Bentley]]," writes [https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/csi-studies/studies/summer00/art02.html Cold War specialist] Thomas Powers. By 2006, "[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/apr/08/russia.davidsmith most historians] had come to the conclusion that Hiss was probably guilty," agrees Aldrich. "Those who have studied the Hiss case by and large believe that he was guilty of perjury and quite likely also guilty of espionage, that is, of passing government documents to the Soviets," concur Gilbert Geis [http://socialecology.uci.edu/faculty/ggeis of the University of California, Irvine] and Leigh B. Bienen [http://homicide.northwestern.edu/about/LeighBienen/ of Northwestern].<ref>Gilbert Geis and Leigh B. Bienen, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=FPRslbPnMjwC Crimes of the Century: From Leopold and Loeb to O.J. Simpson]'' (Lebanon, N.H.: UPNE, 1998), ISBN 1555533604, pp. 130-131</ref> [http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~davidgr/ Rutgers historian] David Greenberg refers to "the [http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/16/technology/online-the-hiss-defense-doesn-t-rest.html?pagewanted=all dwindling band] of those who believe in Hiss"; "the majority of modern American historians today and particularly those specializing in domestic Cold War," concludes [http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTk5Y2ZmNTQ3NWUyZGQwMTZhZjQxYTRkZjZhNGNmZDM liberal historian] David Oshinsky, "see evidence pointing overwhelmingly to Hiss being guilty as charged.”<ref>David Oshinsky, "[http://web.archive.org/web/20100604145006/http://www.nyu.edu/library/bobst/research/tam/hiss_david_oshinsky.pdf Alger Hiss and History]" (Center for the United States and the Cold War, New York University), April 5, 2007, p. 4 (Archive)</ref>

"In the end, the publication of the Venona intercepts settled the matter," observes Stanley Kutler [http://www.law.wisc.edu/profiles/sikutler@wisc.edu of the University of Wisconsin Law School]. "[T]o [http://writ.lp.findlaw.com/books/reviews/20040806_kutler.html all but the truest of believers], 'Ales' could only be Alger Hiss." The Soviet agent "Ales" is assumed by "[http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/hiss/hissvenona.html most scholars] to be Alger Hiss," agrees Douglas O. Linder [http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/FTrials/linder.htm of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law]. "For the [http://microformguides.gale.com/Data/Download/9100000C.rtf majority of scholars], the critical ALES transmission puts to rest any doubt about Hiss’s complicity in the Soviet underground," concurs R. Bruce Craig, a [http://www.upei.ca/history/bcraig specialist in Cold War history] and [http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/116899.html author of a forthcoming Hiss biography]. Even [http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-plank/reagan-appointee-and-recent-mccain-adviser-charles-fried-supports-obama Obama supporter] Charles Fried, a professor at Hiss's ''alma mater'', Harvard Law School (and former Justice of the court that granted Hiss's petition for readmittance to the Massachusetts Bar), writes, "it is now clear to [http://www.amacad.org/publications/bulletin/winter2006/Winter2006Bulletin.pdf all but the most obdurate] that Alger Hiss was a Soviet agent." Historians John Earl Haynes [https://www.h-net.org/people/person_view.php?id=124585 of the Library of Congress] and Harvey Klehr [http://polisci.emory.edu/faculty%20pages/klehr.htm of Emory University] sum up:

FOIA

SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit

7,178

edits