Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pentagon"
(division of the article) |
MountainDew (talk | contribs) (seconding Ed) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I suggest a division of the article into (1) the geometric figure and (2) the big office building. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:12, 6 April 2007 (EDT) | :I suggest a division of the article into (1) the geometric figure and (2) the big office building. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 17:12, 6 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Second. [[User:MountainDew|MountainDew]] 17:13, 6 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:13, April 6, 2007
What the hell?! Everwill 15:28, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
It’s not vandalism, its true, and well sourced. One of the largest protests of the Vietnam War included an attempt to levitate and exorcize the Pentagon—I think that is an interesting part of the building’s history so I added it to the article—in the future, please do not delete properly sourced information without at least looking at the references. It may be odd, and I’d be open to listening to an argument for why it doesn’t belong here (but it is factual, concise, clean, family friendly, historically accurate, true and verifiable so it seems to met the sites rules) but it is most certainly NOT vandalism.--Reginod 16:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
Concise? I don't think so. That takes up 3/4 of the article. MountainDew 16:48, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
- I suggest a division of the article into (1) the geometric figure and (2) the big office building. --Ed Poor 17:12, 6 April 2007 (EDT)
Second. MountainDew 17:13, 6 April 2007 (EDT)