Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia talk:Administrators"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rob Pommer (talk | contribs) m (Question) |
m (tweak to font color rather than intentionaly broken link) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Questions? == | == Questions? == | ||
Yeah, | Yeah, | ||
| − | '''Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons...Unceasing reverts of articles, "tit for tat" editing and argument without end, | + | '''Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons...Unceasing reverts of articles, "tit for tat" editing and argument without end, <font color="red">on points contrary to the Conservapedia philosophy</font>, all are cause for blocking a user.''' |
I'm unsure what the first sentence actually means given the words in red.--[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 18:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT) | I'm unsure what the first sentence actually means given the words in red.--[[User:Rob Pommer| Cracker]]<sub>[[User_talk:Rob_Pommer|talk]]</sub> 18:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:47, April 6, 2007
Questions?
Yeah, Unlike Wikipedia, we do not block for ideological reasons...Unceasing reverts of articles, "tit for tat" editing and argument without end, on points contrary to the Conservapedia philosophy, all are cause for blocking a user.
I'm unsure what the first sentence actually means given the words in red.-- Crackertalk 18:44, 6 April 2007 (EDT)