Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
126 bytes removed ,  22:59, August 21, 2011
continuing discussion moved to Talk:Piltdown Man
Line 14: Line 14:     
::Well put, Jcw.  ''Conservapedia'' shouldn't have a separate page on "why conservatives oppose teaching the [[Piltdown Man]] as truth" either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:44, 21 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::Well put, Jcw.  ''Conservapedia'' shouldn't have a separate page on "why conservatives oppose teaching the [[Piltdown Man]] as truth" either.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:44, 21 August 2011 (EDT)
−
:::Although to be fair, does anyone NOT oppose teaching the Piltdown Man as truth? He's more of a Piltdown Straw Man these days. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 18:50, 21 August 2011 (EDT)
+
 
 +
(continuing discussion moved to [[Talk:Piltdown Man]])
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,485

edits

Navigation menu