Changes

942 bytes added ,  04:49, August 23, 2011
Line 8: Line 8:     
SeanS, I replaced the personal attacks with the template that is prescribed by policy.  If you disagree with that policy, then take it up with the policy makers.  Your assertion about "hiding the evidence" makes little sense, as no-one was seeking censure ''for'' the personal remarks, but simply annihilating them for the sake of civility.  I am a completely disintereted party who read through the "conversation", saw the civility policy invoked, read said policy and enacted it as written.  I do not think I should be the one criticised for the fact that up unitl then everyone failed to follow the policy. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 23:13, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
 
SeanS, I replaced the personal attacks with the template that is prescribed by policy.  If you disagree with that policy, then take it up with the policy makers.  Your assertion about "hiding the evidence" makes little sense, as no-one was seeking censure ''for'' the personal remarks, but simply annihilating them for the sake of civility.  I am a completely disintereted party who read through the "conversation", saw the civility policy invoked, read said policy and enacted it as written.  I do not think I should be the one criticised for the fact that up unitl then everyone failed to follow the policy. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 23:13, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Slight change. ==
 +
 +
I think it would be fair to say I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientific_controversy&action=historysubmit&diff=894934&oldid=894584 clarified] your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Scientific_controversy&diff=prev&oldid=894584 edit]. What say you? --[[User:Chouston|Chouston]] 00:24, 30 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
:I don't know that it's a clarification, so much as a slight change of meaning.  Some scientific controversy is '''not''' driving advancement, which I left room for in my edit.  As it currently stands, the article says that controversy ''necessarily'' drives advancement, which is not necessarily true. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 20:51, 31 July 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Extra privileges granted ==
 +
 +
You've been granted blocking and SkipCatcha privileges.  Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:08, 17 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
:Oh.  Thanks. [[User:LowKey|LowKey]] 00:49, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha
195

edits