Changes

588 bytes added ,  23:33, August 24, 2011
Line 106: Line 106:     
:I write in conservapedia for the sole purpose to explain all cosmology to people who don't understand it and might think that the [[Big Bang]] is a theory of the universe, while it is [[Einsteinian gravitation]] that I propagate since Einstein is already dead and can't speak. E.g. contemporary students don't even know that Einstein said that spacetime metric '''''must be non symmetric''''' while the [[Big Bang]] metric is assumed as symmetric and Einstein's paper not mentioned in bibliografy from which those students learn creationism instead of physics as they should.  
 
:I write in conservapedia for the sole purpose to explain all cosmology to people who don't understand it and might think that the [[Big Bang]] is a theory of the universe, while it is [[Einsteinian gravitation]] that I propagate since Einstein is already dead and can't speak. E.g. contemporary students don't even know that Einstein said that spacetime metric '''''must be non symmetric''''' while the [[Big Bang]] metric is assumed as symmetric and Einstein's paper not mentioned in bibliografy from which those students learn creationism instead of physics as they should.  
−
:I'd appreciate your answering this message.
+
:I'd appreciate your answering this message. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 19:33, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 
 
::I don't pretend to understand cosmology but please add things to the [[redshift]] article we already have. Also if you're creating articles on things that are your personal opinion or ideas then an Essay is more appropriate. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:38, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
 
::I don't pretend to understand cosmology but please add things to the [[redshift]] article we already have. Also if you're creating articles on things that are your personal opinion or ideas then an Essay is more appropriate. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:38, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::OK Max, if you think it is better for understanding the [[redshift]]s then I put it there.
 +
:::I thought that a short explanations, when a new idea is encountered are better for understanding the subject since a big articles might discourage people from trying to understand real simple things as cosmology, or astronomy (the tough part is astrophysics), but then we would have two styles of explaining things which might be even worse. So  let's keep related things together. [[User:JimJast|JimJast]] 19:33, 24 August 2011 (EDT)
SkipCaptcha
708

edits