Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Counterexamples to Relativity (view source)

Revision as of 06:36, August 25, 2011

392 bytes added ,  06:36, August 25, 2011
→‎Relativity and Electromagnetism: I think relavitist purists would actually say all that is needed is a maximum velocity, whether that is "c" or something else.
Line 73: Line 73:     
@Andy Schlafly: Relativity predicts that no particle with mass can go the speed of light or faster. How do you explain that no particle accelerator has been able to get a massive particle at or above the speed of light? How do you explain the results that the inertial mass increases with velocity, as relativity predicts? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 19:00, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
 
@Andy Schlafly: Relativity predicts that no particle with mass can go the speed of light or faster. How do you explain that no particle accelerator has been able to get a massive particle at or above the speed of light? How do you explain the results that the inertial mass increases with velocity, as relativity predicts? --[[User:MatthewQ|MatthewQ]] 19:00, 23 August 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Relativity assumes that, rather than predicts it.  I think relavitist purists would actually say all that is needed is a maximum velocity, whether that is "c" or something else.  Many would not be genuinely surprised if velocities slightly faster than ''c'' are ultimately attained, and ''c'' itself may be changing over time.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 02:36, 25 August 2011 (EDT)
    
== Standard kilogrammes? ==
 
== Standard kilogrammes? ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,597

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/905196"

Navigation menu