Changes

m
Line 60: Line 60:  
===And what happened to gravitational energy?===
 
===And what happened to gravitational energy?===
   −
And what is ''gravitational energy'' that one simply differentiate to get "gravitational force" that we know from Einsteins that it is not there at all? Here we came to the real question. The answer is interesting though very, very, simple: It is energy content of matter in <math>E=mc^2</math>. What?! Says every physicists I told this story to. It it were so simple we would learn it already in a high school.  
+
And what is ''gravitational energy'' that one simply differentiate to get "gravitational force" that we know from Einsteins that it is not there at all? Here we came to the real question. The answer is interesting though very, very, simple: It is energy content of matter in  
 +
:<math>E=mc^2</math>.  
 +
What?! Says every physicists I told this story to. It it were so simple we would learn it already in a high school.  
    
I am a "crank" though with zero credibility among scientist and so despite I discovered those things already in 1985 they were not published before this essay (OK, they were published in RW, but supressed by university of Warsaw since I was not their student enymore and so my paper explaining gravitation and cosmological redshif and such, shouldn't be linked to from their server. So I just typed it in manually into CP server and let see how long it survives here.  
 
I am a "crank" though with zero credibility among scientist and so despite I discovered those things already in 1985 they were not published before this essay (OK, they were published in RW, but supressed by university of Warsaw since I was not their student enymore and so my paper explaining gravitation and cosmological redshif and such, shouldn't be linked to from their server. So I just typed it in manually into CP server and let see how long it survives here.  
   −
For the time being you, the readers of CP, may find it in a form of my paper [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] or in simpler version that a high school student may repeat herself or himself [[Essay:Demystified gravitation]] in a form of 11 step derivation of ''cosmological redshift'' for our universe, that the Big Bang aficionados neglected to calculate before jumping to conclusion that the universe is ''surely'' expanding. And this way converting the majority of non believers into believers in ''creation'' of the whole universe out of nothing as it was planned by John Archibald Wheeler, who believed in it too. Though he believed that the expansion would turn out to be decelerating according to his theory while it turned out to be apparent and looking like accelerating. That I managed to explain after splitting the illusion of acceleration to Taylor series and confirming the observations with accuracy to one standard deviation. So the expansion being an illusion got confirmed by all observations. Though still not accepted by scientific journals, so the astronomers are sent on a wild goose chase to find this "[[dark energy]]" somewhere in the universe.
+
For the time being you, the readers of CP, may find it in a form of my paper [[Essay:Hubble redshift in Einstein's universe]] or in simpler version that a high school student may repeat herself or himself [[Essay:Demystified gravitation]] in a form of step by step derivation of ''cosmological redshift'' for our universe, that the Big Bang aficionados neglected to calculate before jumping to conclusion that the universe is ''"surely"'' expanding. And this way converting the majority of non believers into believers in ''creation'' of the whole universe from nothing as it was planned by John Archibald Wheeler, who believed in it too, just was ashamed to admit being a [[relativists|relativist]] himself. Though he believed that the expansion would turn out to be decelerating according to his belief in "attractive gravitational force", while the expansion turned out to be apparent only and looking like accelerating. That I managed to explain after splitting the illusion of acceleration to Taylor series and confirming the observations with accuracy to one standard deviation.  
 +
 
 +
===Why cranks are sometimes right===
 +
 
 +
Simpy because they learn early in their lives what science is and what is not and that anyone who applies all the rules of science is as likely as anyone else to discover the truth. And even more so since s/he doesn't believe scientific prejudices (or often doesn't know them being an amateur only) so the well educated (but not well enogh to stop thinking on his/her own) crank comes faster with a right solution. In Einstein words's it is like this ''"when all the experts decide that something can't be calculated comes an ignorant who don't know it and calculates it"''. It happened in my case with the redshift.
 +
 
 +
So the expansion being an illusion got confirmed by all observations. Though still not accepted by scientific journals, so the astronomers are sent on a wild goose chase to find this "[[dark energy]]" somewhere in the universe.
    
==Mathematics==
 
==Mathematics==
SkipCaptcha
708

edits