| Line 39: |
Line 39: |
| | ===There is more to gravitation than that=== | | ===There is more to gravitation than that=== |
| | | | |
| − | Something that destroys the Big Bang is much stronger. It is that the most prominent difference between the old prejudice of expansion and reality is the flat spacetime proposed already in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]]<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis. One of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics, which happened almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it as I write about it in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' though with nobody, especially cosmologists, paying any attention). Possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki. | + | Something that refutes the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis is much stronger. Except explaining the gravitational force as seeking by the particles the most probable location in spacetime, pushing in the process on other particles with a force that is presently (in post Newtonian times) called ''gravitational force'' |
| | + | |
| | + | :<math>F=-(d/dx)[E=mc^2(d\tau/dt)]</math> |
| | + | |
| | + | where <math>x</math> is didplacement, <math>E</math> is energy of particle, <math>m</math> is mass of particle, <math>c</math> is speed of light in vavuum, <math>\tau</math> is proper time of particle, and <math>t</math>, is the time of observer. The most prominent difference between the old prejudice of expansion of universe and reality is the flat spacetime proposed in 1993 by [[Jayant Narlikar]] and [[Halton Arp]]<ref>Narlikar, J. and Arp, H. Flat spactime cosmology - a unified framework for extragalactic redshifts, 1993, Astrophysical Journal, Part 1. </ref>. Instead of [[curvature of spacetime]] of the [[Big Bang]] hypothesis. One of the most idiotic hypothesis in physics, which happened almost a century after Einsteins (Mileva Marić and Albert, who explained it as I write about it in my ''"[[Gravitation demystified]]"'' though with nobody, especially cosmologists, paying any attention). Possibly for low popularity of CP as scientific wiki. |
| | | | |
| | The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below). | | The flat spacetime requires coupling between time and space such that it makes the time running slower in curved space proportionally to the exponent of distance in the curved space (see the exact relation below). |
| | | | |
| − | According to exact calculations, that in this case the Newtonian calculations are (and not refuted yet by any cosmologist, while several looked at them including a professor of mathematics teaching a few years earlier the General Relativity in Cambridge, Massachusetts <ref>Prof. Tadeusz Bałaban, presently tenured professor at [[Rutgers University]] in New Jersey, who checked the calculations in February 1985 before saying that they don't contain any mathematical errors, after which they were sent them to ''[["Nature"]]'', where the editor rejected them for his disbelief of them without any peer review.</ref> the universe is stationary, as it was assumed in the first Einsteins model universe of 1917, its [[Hubble constant]]: assumed ratio of recession velocity of galaxies to their distance) in reality this ratio turns out to be :<math>H_o=c/R_E=70km/s/Mpc</math>, | + | According to exact calculations, that in this case the Newtonian calculations are (and not refuted yet by any cosmologist, while several looked at them including a professor of mathematics teaching a few years earlier the General Relativity in Cambridge, Massachusetts <ref>Prof. Tadeusz Bałaban, presently tenured professor at [[Rutgers University]] in New Jersey, who checked the calculations in February 1985 before saying that they don't contain any mathematical errors, after which they were sent them to ''[["Nature"]]'', where the editor rejected them for his disbelief of them without any peer review.</ref> the universe is stationary, as it was assumed in the first Einsteins model universe of 1917, its [[Hubble constant]]: assumed ratio of recession velocity of galaxies to their distance) in reality this ratio turns out to be |
| | + | |
| | + | :<math>H_o=c/R_E=70km/s/Mpc</math>, |
| | + | |
| | where <math>c</math> is speed of light in vacuum, <math>R_E</math> is [[Einstein's radius]] of [[curvature of space]] implies <math>R_E=13</math> billion light years, and density of space of space of universe about | | where <math>c</math> is speed of light in vacuum, <math>R_E</math> is [[Einstein's radius]] of [[curvature of space]] implies <math>R_E=13</math> billion light years, and density of space of space of universe about |
| | + | |
| | :<math>6 \times 10^{-27}kg/m^3</math> | | :<math>6 \times 10^{-27}kg/m^3</math> |
| − | and illusion of accelerating expansion with
| + | |
| | + | considered realistic by astronomers. The illusion of accelerating expansion comes out as |
| | + | |
| | :<math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math> | | :<math>dH/dt=-H_o^2/2</math> |
| | + | |
| | that was observed in 1998 with accuracy of one standard deviation. Therefore confirmed observationally, with maximum accuracy, with which we need to confirm observationally the theoretically predicted numbers to consder them in perfect agreement with observation. | | that was observed in 1998 with accuracy of one standard deviation. Therefore confirmed observationally, with maximum accuracy, with which we need to confirm observationally the theoretically predicted numbers to consder them in perfect agreement with observation. |
| | | | |
| | The almost Newtonian calculations suggest that time in deep space galaxies changes with distance from our Galaxy as | | The almost Newtonian calculations suggest that time in deep space galaxies changes with distance from our Galaxy as |
| | + | |
| | :<math>d \tau/dt=exp(-r/R_E)</math>, | | :<math>d \tau/dt=exp(-r/R_E)</math>, |
| | + | |
| | where <math>\tau</math> is proper time of distant galaxy, <math>t</math> is our time (in our Galaxy), <math>r</math> is distance to this remote galaxy, and <math>R_E</math> is the mentioned already [[Einstein's radius]]. | | where <math>\tau</math> is proper time of distant galaxy, <math>t</math> is our time (in our Galaxy), <math>r</math> is distance to this remote galaxy, and <math>R_E</math> is the mentioned already [[Einstein's radius]]. |
| | | | |