Difference between revisions of "Abuse of discretion"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by Xanadu1 (Talk) to last revision by DavidE)
(ballsack)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''"Abuse of discretion"'''  is a legal standard used by [[appellate court]]s in reviewing many types of decisions made by trial courts,typically decisions on matters of [[equity]].  This standard is highly deferential in presuming that the trial court acted correctly.  This standard creates a very high threshold for an appellant to surmount to overturn a trial decision.  The onset of the ''[[hard look doctrine]]'' has made the standard slightly less deferential, though.  ''See'', ''e.g.'' ''Citizens to Preserve Overton Park''.
+
ballsack
−
 
 
−
Note, however, that "[a] district court by definition abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law." ''Koon v. United States'', 518 U.S. 81, 100 (1996). "[T]he abuse-of-discretion standard includes review to determine that the discretion was not guided by erroneous legal conclusions." ''Koon'', 518 U.S. at 100.
 
−
 
 
−
[[Category:Law]]
 

Revision as of 02:45, September 8, 2011

ballsack