Changes

Line 168: Line 168:  
::::Max, your purported inability to fully understand my post is strange given my use of bold font to highlight his error and my clear commentary on his error.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:58, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::::Max, your purported inability to fully understand my post is strange given my use of bold font to highlight his error and my clear commentary on his error.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:58, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::No, I understood just fine. This is a list of 15 questions ''for evolutionists'' to answer not for creationists to answer. So you can't complain when he gives you an evolutionist answer! You also failed to address the rest of his post. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:03, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::No, I understood just fine. This is a list of 15 questions ''for evolutionists'' to answer not for creationists to answer. So you can't complain when he gives you an evolutionist answer! You also failed to address the rest of his post. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 23:03, 13 September 2011 (EDT)
−
:::SamCoulter, Is atheism merely a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods? Is there a [[Atheism|significant amount of encyclopedias of philosophy that take issue with that notion]]? If so, which ones?
+
:::SamCoulter, is atheism merely a lack of belief in the existence of God or gods? Is there a [[Atheism|significant amount of encyclopedias of philosophy that take issue with that notion]]? If so, which ones? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 00:49, 14 September 2011 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,872

edits