Difference between revisions of "User talk:SeanS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 11: Line 11:
 
::::I'm sorry but I'm confused. What do you mean ? Is it wrong to say that those are biblical or to say that there are deadly ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:44, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
::::I'm sorry but I'm confused. What do you mean ? Is it wrong to say that those are biblical or to say that there are deadly ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 22:44, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::The sins are biblical. but calling them the seven deadly sins isnt. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:49, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 
:::::The sins are biblical. but calling them the seven deadly sins isnt. --[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:49, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
 +
::::::Alright, thanks for the update.--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 23:00, 19 September 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 03:00, September 20, 2011

Hi there.

Archive 1


Machismo Article

I am sorry about that but you should have a look at this article then: pride. --ARamis 22:34, 19 September 2011 (EDT)

I know what it is and I know what the Sins are, but they aren't biblical. --SeanS 22:35, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
Ok. Are you saying that I should have named the category Machismo and Christianity instead ?--ARamis 22:38, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
No, its fine. I was removing the 7 deadly sins thing simply because those arent biblical, they are sins, but not "seven deadly"--SeanS 22:40, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
I'm sorry but I'm confused. What do you mean ? Is it wrong to say that those are biblical or to say that there are deadly ?--ARamis 22:44, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
The sins are biblical. but calling them the seven deadly sins isnt. --SeanS 22:49, 19 September 2011 (EDT)
Alright, thanks for the update.--ARamis 23:00, 19 September 2011 (EDT)