Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Does Thunderf00t lack machismo?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==What is with you and machismo ?== Conservative, I find it really intriguing that you spend so much time and energy writing disputable essays about machismo.<br/> What is with y...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Conservative, I find it really intriguing that you spend so much time and energy writing disputable essays about machismo.<br/> | Conservative, I find it really intriguing that you spend so much time and energy writing disputable essays about machismo.<br/> | ||
What is with you and machismo ? No offense but have you heard of [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/overcompensation overcompensation] ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 16:58, 20 September 2011 (EDT) | What is with you and machismo ? No offense but have you heard of [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/overcompensation overcompensation] ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 16:58, 20 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Unless there's a reference to it in one of his own articles then the answer is almost certainly no. It's not worth arguing with Conservative; he's probably the single biggest reason for the low esteem that most people hold CP in. If you Google "Demyers laws" you'll find a set of laws on how to lose an internet debate that were inspired by his "work" here. My advice is to give up on CP and start editing at http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/Main_Page, a Christian encyclopaedia that isn't obsessed with Penn Jillette's buttocks and pictures of rabbits. I feel sorry for Andy Schlafly, but frankly if he doesn'trein in that idiot he has only himself to blame. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:02, 20 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:02, September 20, 2011
What is with you and machismo ?
Conservative, I find it really intriguing that you spend so much time and energy writing disputable essays about machismo.
What is with you and machismo ? No offense but have you heard of overcompensation ?--ARamis 16:58, 20 September 2011 (EDT)
- Unless there's a reference to it in one of his own articles then the answer is almost certainly no. It's not worth arguing with Conservative; he's probably the single biggest reason for the low esteem that most people hold CP in. If you Google "Demyers laws" you'll find a set of laws on how to lose an internet debate that were inspired by his "work" here. My advice is to give up on CP and start editing at http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/Main_Page, a Christian encyclopaedia that isn't obsessed with Penn Jillette's buttocks and pictures of rabbits. I feel sorry for Andy Schlafly, but frankly if he doesn'trein in that idiot he has only himself to blame. --JMairs 17:02, 20 September 2011 (EDT)