Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay: Does Thunderf00t lack machismo?"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Unless there's a reference to it in one of his own articles then the answer is almost certainly no. It's not worth arguing with Conservative; he's probably the single biggest reason for the low esteem that most people hold CP in. If you Google "Demyers laws" you'll find a set of laws on how to lose an internet debate that were inspired by his "work" here. My advice is to give up on CP and start editing at http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/Main_Page, a Christian encyclopaedia that isn't obsessed with Penn Jillette's buttocks and pictures of rabbits. I feel sorry for Andy Schlafly, but frankly if he doesn'trein in that idiot he has only himself to blame. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:02, 20 September 2011 (EDT) | :Unless there's a reference to it in one of his own articles then the answer is almost certainly no. It's not worth arguing with Conservative; he's probably the single biggest reason for the low esteem that most people hold CP in. If you Google "Demyers laws" you'll find a set of laws on how to lose an internet debate that were inspired by his "work" here. My advice is to give up on CP and start editing at http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/Main_Page, a Christian encyclopaedia that isn't obsessed with Penn Jillette's buttocks and pictures of rabbits. I feel sorry for Andy Schlafly, but frankly if he doesn'trein in that idiot he has only himself to blame. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:02, 20 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
::That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT) | ::That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--[[User:ARamis|ARamis]] 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::Who knows? I wish he would, because I'd really rather NOT leave here; there are plenty of good, decent editors who'd love to help make it into what Andy wanted it to be, but are prevented by that idiot and his obsession with looking at atheist's bodies. I'll just add that Conservative is also a pathologically dishonest individual who refuses to answer questions, changes the subject (Usually to "Why don't you write MORE inane articles of the sort you're criticising me for writing if you think I'm doing a bad job?") and makes 100 edits a day while his (locked - the coward) talk page claims he won't be doing much at Conservapedia for a while. Oh no; he's doing PLENTY at Conservapedia - mainly destroying its credibility. --[[User:JMairs|JMairs]] 17:09, 20 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:09, September 20, 2011
What is with you and machismo ?
Conservative, I find it really intriguing that you spend so much time and energy writing disputable essays about machismo.
What is with you and machismo ? No offense but have you heard of overcompensation ?--ARamis 16:58, 20 September 2011 (EDT)
- Unless there's a reference to it in one of his own articles then the answer is almost certainly no. It's not worth arguing with Conservative; he's probably the single biggest reason for the low esteem that most people hold CP in. If you Google "Demyers laws" you'll find a set of laws on how to lose an internet debate that were inspired by his "work" here. My advice is to give up on CP and start editing at http://astorehouseofknowledge.info/Main_Page, a Christian encyclopaedia that isn't obsessed with Penn Jillette's buttocks and pictures of rabbits. I feel sorry for Andy Schlafly, but frankly if he doesn'trein in that idiot he has only himself to blame. --JMairs 17:02, 20 September 2011 (EDT)
- That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--ARamis 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT)
- Who knows? I wish he would, because I'd really rather NOT leave here; there are plenty of good, decent editors who'd love to help make it into what Andy wanted it to be, but are prevented by that idiot and his obsession with looking at atheist's bodies. I'll just add that Conservative is also a pathologically dishonest individual who refuses to answer questions, changes the subject (Usually to "Why don't you write MORE inane articles of the sort you're criticising me for writing if you think I'm doing a bad job?") and makes 100 edits a day while his (locked - the coward) talk page claims he won't be doing much at Conservapedia for a while. Oh no; he's doing PLENTY at Conservapedia - mainly destroying its credibility. --JMairs 17:09, 20 September 2011 (EDT)
- That is exactly what I was asking myself: why does Andy do nothing about Conservative, who is clearly not helping CP ?--ARamis 17:07, 20 September 2011 (EDT)