Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Non-fiction Books"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::::Not knowing how the book reads, I figured it meant "Oppressive dictatorship socialism" and not "oppressive dictatorship socialism".--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 00:47, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | :::::Not knowing how the book reads, I figured it meant "Oppressive dictatorship socialism" and not "oppressive dictatorship socialism".--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 00:47, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
::::::I'm not sure I follow you. [[User:RSnelik|RSnelik]] 00:49, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ::::::I'm not sure I follow you. [[User:RSnelik|RSnelik]] 00:49, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
| + | :::::::Read the book, I have every confidence in PJ to accurately represent the situations.--[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 00:51, 22 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:51, September 22, 2011
I was thrown off by the fact that someone created the article under my feet. I was further thrown off by the fact that the first two books on the list were the first two books on my version of the list, though I simply listed the bible and gave the full title of the wealth of nations. --DrDean 00:37, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- That's OK; I was just having a dig at you for adding two books by Phyllis Schlafly. I bet you always brought your teacher an apple :-D --SamCoulter 00:38, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- One of the staffers at the Eagle forum pointed me here, so me being here is me sucking up to Mrs. Schlafly if anything. :D --DrDean 00:41, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- Ha ha, you're getting two for the price of one then :-) --SamCoulter 00:42, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- If it's not complementary about Sweden's system, why did you write their system as "good socialism"? No matter what country's using it, socialism is not a good thing. RSnelik 00:45, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- Not knowing how the book reads, I figured it meant "Oppressive dictatorship socialism" and not "oppressive dictatorship socialism".--SeanS 00:47, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- If it's not complementary about Sweden's system, why did you write their system as "good socialism"? No matter what country's using it, socialism is not a good thing. RSnelik 00:45, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- Ha ha, you're getting two for the price of one then :-) --SamCoulter 00:42, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
- One of the staffers at the Eagle forum pointed me here, so me being here is me sucking up to Mrs. Schlafly if anything. :D --DrDean 00:41, 22 September 2011 (EDT)