Difference between revisions of "Talk:Euler's Formula"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
CatWatcher (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 17:16, 7 April 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 17:16, 7 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
::e^(i*pi) = -1 is derived from euler's formula by set <math>\phi = \pi</math>.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 17:21, 7 April 2007 (EDT) | ::e^(i*pi) = -1 is derived from euler's formula by set <math>\phi = \pi</math>.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 17:21, 7 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::: granted, but I have heard it claimed that this formula is the "e=Mc^2" od mathematics, in that it ties together four of the most infamous numbers in the whole of maths. -1, as for centuries, it was thought that numbers could not be negative, pi, which was always thought to be fractional (hence squaring the circle), i, which was thought to be impossible, but now is termed imaginary, and e, the base of natural logarthims, which underpins calculus. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::I would certainly say this was Euler's masterpiece, even though I am a mainly a Graph Theorist, and the other 'Euler's Formula' is the one I am most familiar with.--[[User:CatWatcher|CatWatcher]] 18:39, 7 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:39, April 7, 2007
I would disagree that this is Euler's most famous formula. I would plump for either e^(i*pi) = -1 or the F+V -E = 2 for convex polyhedra. Google search brings up these two ... --CatWatcher 17:16, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
- e^(i*pi) = -1 is derived from euler's formula by set .Jaques 17:21, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
- granted, but I have heard it claimed that this formula is the "e=Mc^2" od mathematics, in that it ties together four of the most infamous numbers in the whole of maths. -1, as for centuries, it was thought that numbers could not be negative, pi, which was always thought to be fractional (hence squaring the circle), i, which was thought to be impossible, but now is termed imaginary, and e, the base of natural logarthims, which underpins calculus.
- e^(i*pi) = -1 is derived from euler's formula by set .Jaques 17:21, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
- I would certainly say this was Euler's masterpiece, even though I am a mainly a Graph Theorist, and the other 'Euler's Formula' is the one I am most familiar with.--CatWatcher 18:39, 7 April 2007 (EDT)