Difference between revisions of "Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Man oh man! We are really beating Wikipedia up! | Man oh man! We are really beating Wikipedia up! | ||
[[Will N.]] | [[Will N.]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Out of idle curiosity, is the important and valid point that "wikipedia is wacky"? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:BenjaminS|Ben]] | ||
Revision as of 16:19, January 6, 2007
I think that we should call the page "Wikipedia."
Tim,
Thanks for your suggestion, but I'm inclined to disagree. "Wackypedia" conveys an important and valid point that merely calling it "Wikipedia" would not. --Aschlafly 22:54, 21 December 2006 (EST)
Man oh man! We are really beating Wikipedia up! Will N.
Out of idle curiosity, is the important and valid point that "wikipedia is wacky"?